NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2

NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2 VCI Summary Student Name Capella University NURS-FPX9000 Doctor of Nursing Practice 1 Professor Name Submission Date VCI Summary The students were able to start their DNP learner journey on a foundation created through a virtual meeting to check in. The summary provides a review of the conversations about project scope, what to do to implement projects, and recommendations for modifications of the topics listed. During the meeting, an alignment with the instructor and student on quality improvements was realized, and the viability of the project was also determined. The meeting clarified important issues that must be addressed to make sure students go through the five-course sequence of the DNP project successfully. Meeting Details A virtual check-in (VCI) meeting was held on April 14, 2026, at around 2:30 PM. There were two participants in the meeting: the DNP and the Course Instructor. The preceptor is not required to be present, but will check by e-mail with the instructor to ensure the project is moving forward as desired. Summary of Key Points The VCI was interested in reviewing and discussing the proposed DNP project topic and revising expectations for the new DNP course. The original project idea was uncontrolled hypertension in females, which was considered not possible to reach a measurable outcome due to the nature of the setting (the patient would be discharged before the measurable outcomes of an intervention had taken place). The recommended change in topic to a more stable and measurable topic would include example topics such as hand hygiene compliance, pressure ulcer prevention, and a revised topic suggested for this topic as being viable and measurable – persistent hypertension. For example, the instructor said that the project should have a clear practice gap that is not yet being addressed and should have an intervention that is measurable and defined. In addition, a well-constructed PICO question needs to be included. A minimum of 3 peer-reviewed articles is required for the current course, and 5 will be required for the next course. The preceptor shall inform the teacher directly after the meeting to ensure the project the student is working on is proceeding as expected. Reflect on Project Progress The VCI meeting has shown the progress that has been made by students engaging in the VCI meeting and through sound student-instructor guidance with student project direction. During the meeting, it was emphasized that the project topic should be chosen carefully, especially considering the issue of how well the project fits the studied clinical environment, and the measurable outcomes that can be achieved within the given implementation time period. The students’ transition from uncontrolled hypertension in women to the new direction of persistent hypertension is a positive redirection through the guidance of the instructor, because this project will be viewed as more feasible. Student actively engaged by accepting the guidance given by the instructor and plans to make subsequent revisions to the project scope. The different project topics offer a more direct approach for identifying practice gaps, developing an intervention that is measurable, and will meet the evidence requirements throughout the DNP course sequence. Areas of Uncertainty At the VCI meeting, several sources of ambiguity were unearthed. Firstly, due to the hospital-based discharge environment, the topic of uncontrolled hypertension in females could not be measured, and the student will need to select an alternative topic that will enable them to measure the outcomes of an intervention. Secondly, the instructor proposed a couple of alternative topics—hand hygiene and pressure ulcers—and the student has to decide which alternative topic fits best with the clinical site and practice gap. Third, the process of creating the PICO question, practice gap, and intervention for the new topic being chosen needs clarification. The student will conduct a first search of the literature to identify at least three research articles that will support the new topic being selected for the course. The preceptor’s role will now be to supply an email to the instructor for alignment, which should help to finalize the direction of the student’s project. Conclusion The online check-in was able to uncover the main feasibility problem with the topic that was chosen for the DNP project and provide direction for next steps to consider when choosing to use a new topic. Measurability and evidence are two of the objectives that can be met if the student is instructed to research persistent hypertension, or some other topic that can be fully implemented. With direct feedback from their teacher, the student can now search for other project ideas and also carry out a literature search required for the program. Step-By-Step Instructions to write NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2 Contact us today and receive expert step-by-step instructions for NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2 . References for NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2 References coming soon. Capella professors to choose from for NURS-FPX9000 Class Adriane Stasurak, DNP, RN, ANP-BC. Angela Saathoff, DNP, RN; Jen Green, DNP. (FAQs) related to NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2 Question 1: What is NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2 about? Answer 1: Focuses on summarizing virtual check-in meeting, project feasibility, and topic refinement.